A companys’ reputation can take years
to build and seconds to break. So, in the face of a crisis, a response
strategy can be the difference between success—or failure.
Further, with the rise of social media, it's now easier for the blame of a crisis to circulate globally online which is something PR professionals must account for in every day practice, researchers Moreno, Navarro, Tench and Zerfass (2014) found.
So, what’s the best way for a company
to come out clean and PR practitioners to get them there? Or at least on the positive end of the spectrum.
Crisis communication researcher
Timothy Coombs (2011) found there are 4 main strategies for a company to deal with
crises:
— Denial —
For a denial crisis response, the
company will try to remove any connections with the crisis by attacking
the accuser, denying the issue or scapegoating.
Cosmopolitan Magazine used this crisis
denial response in 2017 when they released a story about a cancer
survivors’ fitness journey with this "misleading" headline:
Instead of admitting their wrongdoing of focusing on a cancer survivors weight loss instead of her struggle back to health, they simply ignored the issue and later removed the story like nothing had happened.
— Diminishment —
During a diminishment crisis response,
the organization will attempt reduce attributions of organizational control and
reduce the negative effects of the crisis by excusing or justifying their
actions.
In 2017, when United Airlines
“disturbingly” dragged a man off the plane due to
overbooking and his refusal to leave, they tried to detour around the issue
only apologizing for having to “re-accommodate” the other customers. While they
later apologized publicly for the incident, this was their first response with
an aim of reducing their attribution to what actually happened.
— Rebuilding —
For the rebuilding crisis response, an
organization will try to rebuild their reputation by compensating those
affected or by apologizing for the wrongdoings.
The PepsiCo company quickly pulled an advertisement and publicly
apologized in 2017, after their campaign with Kendall Jenner protesting caused
backlash as it was deemed offensive to the Black Lives Matter community.
— Reminding —
Finally, the reminding crisis response
strategy aims to build positive connections between an organization and the public by reminding them of the companys' “clean” track record.
During the Virgin Trains crash in Cumbria, the
company’s response was to remind the
public of its’ exemplary record with safety. Its’ founder immediately made a
statement reminding the public of the company's’ 25-year clean track record,
while emphasizing his empathy towards those affected by the crash.
While each crisis response strategy is
tailored to the specific company and situation, what do researchers say is the
best response?
In their crisis communication
research, Brown and White (2007) found none of the four strategies listed above were
statistically better. However, he did find the reminding strategy to be
dominant (in theory) for two reasons:
1. The reminding strategy centers
communication on the relationship between the organization and the
public—promoting empathy and personal relationships over reputation.
2. The other strategies focus on
removing the connection between the organization and the crisis—focusing on
reputation and saving face instead of those affected by the issue.
Brown and White found emphasizing the
organization's good deeds and reminding the public why they became involved
with the organization from the beginning will equally distract the audience and
in turn, help mitigate the crisis.
But overall, they agreed, the
best crisis strategy is maintaining good relationships.
__________________________________________________________
Nicole Ares is a Political
Communications Master's Student at the University of Amsterdam. She has
previous experience in journalism as well as strategic communications work for
non-governmental organizations.
Scholarly Sources For This Article:
(2010) Organization–Public Relationships and Crisis Response Strategies: Impact on Attribution of Responsibility, Journal of Public Relations Research, 23:1, 75-92. doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2010.504792
Coombs, T. (2007). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing and responding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moreno, A., Navarro, C., Tench, R., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Does social media usage matter? An analysis of online practices and digital media perceptions of communication practitioners in Europe. Public Relations Review,41(2), 242-253. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.006
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten