![]() |
Credit to Jahsie Rebecca |
The contrast couldn’t be bigger: the poor attendance at Trump’s inauguration, followed the next day by the largest protest in U.S. history. Around half a million people participated in the Women’s March in Washington D.C. on January 21st 2017, and millions more elsewhere in the country and abroad. In a time-span of only two months, a small idea on Facebook swelled into a worldwide protest. This event shows us both the power of social media to mobilise citizens, and teaches us important lessons about using strategic communication tools for social movements.
Historically women’s movements have been marginalised by the media. But much has changed since the movements in the sixties. The 21st century’s communication tools allowed the Women’s March to make the media work for them, rather than against them. The Women’s March teaches us the power of frames, visuals and the average human being.
The power of frames
With certain frames the organisation of the Women’s March successfully
influenced journalists’ coverage of the event. Research by Nicolini
& Hansen shows that it matters which frame targets which media outlets.
It is easier to spread your message through news outlets that share the
ideology of the protest, but to succeed in a polarised landscape it’s also necessary
to positively influence oppositional media. In the case of the Women’s March,
two of their frames proved effective.
Negative attention was minimalised by using the activation frame; specifically
the message of creating change from grassroots up. Progressive media outlets
supported the frame, activating citizens to join. For the conservative media
outlet FOX News it was difficult to challenge this powerful frame, and
therefore they decided not to cover it. Therefore, the activation frame does
its job to activate, without creating negative coverage.
To generate media attention, the solidarity frame proved most effective.
This frame, specifically the message that the number of protesters was “too
large to count” was covered heavily by the media; even by FOX News. Headlines
such as ‘Donald Trump
protests attract millions across US and world’ and ‘Hundredsof thousands of women protest against Trump’ were omnipresent. Magnitude is
one of the news values journalists are looking for, and therefore emphasising
it is crucial in gaining coverage for your protest.
![]() |
Credit to Johanna Siegmann
|
The power of visuals
Besides the creation of frames, the Women’s March strategically harnessed
the power of visuals. The visuals were cleverly used to establish the frame
that the numbers were too large to ignore, and thereby thwarting
counter-frames. Also, images allowed supporters to identify with the diverse
group of protesters. Any gender, any ethnicity, any sexual orientation, all could
be encouraged to the streets.
The power of the average human being
In the Women’s March the combined voices of average human beings proved to
be a force to be reckoned with. Celebrity endorsements are often utilised in
movements, however the Women’s March teaches us that they also attract oppositional
media that portray them as inauthentic attention-seekers. On the contrary, the honest
voice of the average human being is difficult, if not impossible, to challenge.
The power of average citizens in solidarity reaching for a common goal is what
protests should be about. And what strategic communication should strive for.
About the author:
Nikki Gommers is a political
communication student at the University of Amsterdam. She obtained her bachelor’s
degree in Political Science at Leiden University and has worked for several
campaigns of the PvdA (Dutch Labour Party), as well as this she is a keen advocate
for a less-divided society.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten