![]() |
Screenshot taken from @Kaepernick7 (Twitter) |
Anyway, taking a political stance is not common in professional sports and also goes against (unwritten) rules, rooted in the original olympic value. In Bourdieu's terms, he choose to ignore his habitus and ignore the doxa. Doing so has repurcussions usually, as Giddens (by the words of Falkheimer) warns us. In Kaepernicks case that means that he is without a contract because noone wants to, or dares to offer him a contract.
In that context it is also remarkable that a major sponsor of the NFL, Nike, take a stance by making him the face of their new campaign, because of his protest actions (repeat doxa, habitus, etc.).
Two links:
A CNN report on the Nike campaign.
Back ground article in the New York Times (online)
NB1: This is NOT a 'good' example of a proper blog post, rather a hasty 'note'
NB2: It is very much okay to add your own (relevant) hasty notes on top of your assignment blog posts here. Especially when you have addressed an actuality in class, or found one that is too juice to safe until the next class.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten